Cisco And The Curious Case Of Peter Alfred-Adekeye!

by Gaurav Kheterpal on April 22, 2011

Cisco has been in the news lately, albeit for all the wrong reasons. Once the world’s most valuable tech company in the world, Cisco used to be worth $500 billion. That’s now down to nearly $100 billion and questions continue to be asked over its lost credibility. Investor confidence has hit an all time low and employees seem confused.

Last week, Cisco shutdown its Flip video camera business – and axed 550 employees in an effort to “align its operations”. The move shocked the entire telecom fraternity and my fellow bloggers alike.

And now the telecom giant is back in the news for having orchestrated the arrest of Multiven founder Peter Alfred-Adekeye last year in order to force a settlement of Multiven’s antitrust lawsuit against Cisco. A former Cisco engineer, he was arrested for allegedly hacking into the Cisco’s network. His lawyers say U.S. prosecutors and Cisco misled the Canadian government and B.C. courts into invoking emergency extradition powers to jail Peter Adekeye.

The curious case of Peter Adekeye isn’t just about an individual taking revenge on his ex-employer and vice-versa, it’s might well turn out to be a showdown between the U.S. prosecutors and the Canadian judiciary. Moreover, it raises crucial questions over the “trust” between a manufacturer and the VAR community.

So, who is Peter Adekeye and why he’s ended up on the receiving end from Cisco? Peter Adekeye used to work for Cisco until he left the company in 2005 to set up two networking companies. His first venture, Multiven, sued Cisco in December 2008, alleging the latter forced network equipment owners to buy its SMARTnet service contracts, thereby monopolizing the business of servicing and maintaining Cisco enterprise equipment. Cisco was quick to return the pleasantries and it sued Alfred-Adekeye and Pingsta — another company he founded.

In May 2010, Peter Adekeye was arrested in Vancouver, Canada on 97 counts of hacking. Cisco says Adekeye did this by using a Cisco employee’s user ID and password to download software and access Cisco’s restricted website.  If found guilty, he could be sentenced to 10 years in prison and a US$250,000 fine. Adekeye was subsequently released on bail, but he has not been able to leave Canada since then. The case has made no progress for the past 10 months because the U.S. Attorney’s office has not been able to present the evidence required to extradite Alfred-Adekeye.

His lawyers claim false material was used by Cisco and U.S. prosecutor to dupe Canadian courts. They allege his arrest was orchestrated by Cisco as part of an “aggressive” litigation strategy and Cisco has hidden key facts from the Canadian judiciary. It’s reported that Adekeye even wrote to U.S. President Barack Obama, seeking his intervention but I’m guessing the world’s most powerful man has more important business matters to attend. Cisco declined to comment saying the extradition is a matter between the two governments.

Needless to say, I’m concerned by the broader implications of the growing number of such incidents in the telecom industry. I’m not a legal expert but does Cisco’s policy to push updates and bug fixes to SMARTnet customers, and not to third parties, count as a monopolistic practice? After all, every company does it in some way or the other. Either way, Cisco subsequently settled the lawsuit with both his companies. Time will tell if Cisco can prove Adekeye to be guilty of hacking.

Some people are equating the VAR hacker prosecution to be equivalent to persecution of a competitor. Others believe Cisco wants to teach Adekeye a lesson and set a zero tolerance precedent for existing and ex-VARs. Adekeye’s lawyers say

“Canada was misled; the courts were misled.”

What do you think? Now is the time for the VAR community to stand up and have their say. Please share your opinion by leaving a comment below this post.

Did you like this post? TheTelecomBlog.com publishes daily news, editorial, thoughts, and controversial opinion – you can subscribe by: RSS (click here), or email (click here).

Written by: Gaurav Kheterpal. www.digitcom.ca. Follow TheTelecomBlog.comby: RSS,TwitterFacebook, or YouTube.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • PDF
  • Ping.fm
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Wikio

{ 2 trackbacks }

TheTelecomBlog.com’s Top 6 Posts for April 2011 — TheTelecomBlog.com
August 16, 2012 at 4:52 am
Cisco In Trouble Over Human Rights Violation — TheTelecomBlog.com
August 16, 2012 at 7:59 am

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

Ethical Citizen June 9, 2011 at 1:28 pm

Shame on Cisco to continue playing dirty while their credibility is in the toilet.

olasumbo odulaja June 10, 2011 at 10:20 am

this is a lesson for big/major software org.
they should try to restrict exit of their top management staff who can be a threat to them as they have been exposed to company’s secrets/password as in this case.
Organisation’s should try to pay good money and also offer increase in pay for such exiting staff

insider report December 11, 2011 at 2:56 pm

I know everyone is bashing Cisco for what they did to Peter Alfred Adekeye. I want to see this from both sides of the story from what I have heard from multiple sources Peter is a very sneaky and scandalous guy himself. Now that this is in front of the world he’s playing this innocent, “please please help me I’m this little guy just trying to make it in this world,” act. I don’t buy this bullshit for a second. He must have done something wrong to piss off Cisco and get fired in the first place. He decides to leave a company that he has worked for many years and come out to try to compete against them. He obviously, found some issues while working there, on ways he could profit from Cisco. I wouldn’t trust both of them. One is just this greedy corporate giant who will not tolerate any little guys coming in to their market and will try to squash them right away. The other is the “poor little guy” that thinks he can take on anything. I personally think this guy is delusional. Have you seen his companies website? It’s pathetic, with a business model like that I think this company is going to Zero in no time. Just trying to make a quick buck where he sees a chance to make some money and get famous. I think if he doesn’t sue Cisco he wouldn’t have money to keep his Multiven going. Sorry for my grammar, I’m a bit drunk from a party and I stumbled on this story that i remembered from months back. I’m out peace.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: