Since its own IPO way back in 2004, Google has employed the informal motto, “Don’t Be Evil,” as the basis for much of its decision making. The company’s underlying philosophy has been that you don’t need to exploit users for profits and that its better to invest in improving the world over the long term even if it means sometimes forfeiting short term gains.

By creating a Don’t Be Evil culture, the search engine giant established a baseline for honesty and integrity in its decision-making meant to dissociate itself from any form of cheating or exploitation. The philosophy is said to imbue everything from Google’s search engine algorithms to the company’s privacy settings on it Google+ social network and one embodied by the company through offering many of its unique services (Google Earth, Maps, and Street View for instance) at no cost to users. 

But with a recent decision in a lawsuit in France it looks like its becoming more difficult to be not evil, as Google was found guilty of anti-competitive practices for offering its Google Maps platform for free.

Earlier this week in a Paris court Google France and its parent company Google were found guilty of anti-competitive practices for offering its mapping service for free to businesses across the country and were ordered to pay the plaintiff, Bottin Cartographes, 500,000 Euros (about $660,000). In addition, the court also required Google to pay a fine of 15,000 Euros for this practice.

It’s a huge victory for Bottin Cartographes, a mapping company that has seen its profits dwindle over the years as it’s struggled to compete with the search engine giant who offers the same services absolutely free.

“We proved the illegality of (Google’s) strategy to remove its competitors,” Jean-David Scemmama, attorney for Bottin Cartographes, said in a statement. “The court recognized the unfair and abusive character of the methods used, and allocated Bottin Cartographes all it claimed. This is the first time Google has been convicted for its Google Maps application.”

This decision comes after years of Bottin Cartographes arguing that by offering its mapping services for free the search engine giant was taking control of the mapping industry and stifling competition, as companies like Bottin Cartographes simply can’t afford to offer their services at no cost.

That being said, despite the fact that Google can find 500,000 Euros in the couch in the employee break room, the search engine giant isn’t about to accept this decision and word is an appeal is already in the works.

For me this entire situation raises the interesting question of the legality of ‘free’ in a capitalist society. Truthfully, in a society founded on profits and competition on the face of it there seems nothing more contradictory than offering something that has no direct profit stream connected to it (because you better believe Google makes money of its Maps program, just not from users). Of course for all those of us who exist as the rank-and-file of capitalism, a little more ‘free’ is always welcome.

Did you like this post ? TheTelecomBlog.com publishes daily news, editorial, thoughts, and controversial opinion – you can subscribe by: RSS (click here), or email (click here).

Written by: Matt Klassen. www.digitcom.ca. Follow TheTelecomBlog.com by: RSS, Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube.

Last December, Telus predicted a “Big 2012” for investors and raised its dividend by 10 percent, bumping it up to $2.55 a share. While growth in the smartphone sector is expected to drive revenue, the wireless giant knows diversification is the name of the game. To that effect, the carrier last year partnered with U.S. based digital signage provider Stratacache to provide digital signage services across Canada.

On the same note, Telus yesterday announced that it has acquired Wolf Medical Systems, a company that provides online health records sharing for doctors. The move will create ‘Telus Physician Solutions’ – a new line of business targeted as strengthening the carrier’s position in the country’s healthcare sector.

Wolf Medical Systems has electronically processed more than 11 million patient visit records since 2010. The company offers hosted, cloud-based technology which will provide “anytime anywhere” access to patient information over the carrier’s wireless and wireline networks. The EMR industry is transforming with patients and doctors starting to use smartphones and tablets to view/ process electronic medical records. Telus says doctors using Wolf EMR see more than 26,000 patients a day and review 166,000 lab results

As part of the acquisition, Wolf Medical founder Brendan Byrne will be heading the new business entity – ‘Telus Physician Solutions’.

“Electronic medical records are an essential building block to an efficient healthcare system in Canada,” explained Paul Lepage, senior vice-president, TELUS Health Solutions. “While EMRs have been proven to increase efficiency and performance at both the clinical and regional healthcare system levels, Canada’s EMR penetration rate of about 32 per cent lags behind other OECD countries. By committing to the EMR market with a best-in-class solution, combined with the connectivity that our wireless and wireline broadband networks enable, we are positioned to help increase this adoption rate which will in turn improve work processes, efficiencies in service delivery, and patient health outcomes.”

Telus has been operating in the EMR segment since 2008 when it acquired Emergis, a popular Montreal-based company specializing in electronic health records. Since Telus Health was born, the carrier has pumped in close to $800-million over three years in healthcare-related technology. The acquisition of Wolf Medical will further strengthen Telus Health’s position as a formidable player in the EMR segment.

Given the cut-throat competition in the wireless segment, it’s not unusual to see wireless carriers move out of their comfort zones and explore alternate business lines. Last year, Rogers tried it’s hand at several unconventional business lines such as machine-to-machine (M2M) wireless connectivity, banking, home monitoring service and vanity number services.

The terms of the acquisition were not disclosed.

Did you like this post? TheTelecomBlog.com publishes daily news, editorial, thoughts, and controversial opinion – you can subscribe by: RSS (click here), or email (click here).

Written by: Gaurav Kheterpal. www.digitcom.ca. Follow TheTelecomBlog.comby:RSS,Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube.

As we touched on yesterday, Facebook filed for its initial public offering on Wednesday. The $5 billion IPO filing gives us a unique opportunity to see inside the social networking giant and to examine the numbers behind Mark Zuckerberg’s former dorm room project. More than adding context to Facebook’s market power, the numbers also serve to illuminate just how powerful social media is.

Along with the IPO, Zuckerberg released a letter that outlined Facebook’s origins and mission to “make the world more open and connected.”

“Personal relationships are the fundamental unit of our society. Relationships are how we discover new ideas, understand our world and ultimately derive long-term happiness,” wrote Zuckerberg.

Whether or not Zuckerberg’s dream began as a way to make a lot of money, it looks like that’s exactly what’s happened. The numbers behind Facebook as revealed in SEC filings today are quite compelling.

The company opened its doors in 2004, of course, and now boasts 845 million active users in a network of more than 100 million connections. 483 million people use Facebook daily. The average user, says comScore, spends roughly seven hours a month on Facebook. There are some 100 billion “friendships,” 250 million photos are uploaded each day and 2.7 billion “likes” and comments are made each day.

Facebook made $3.71 billion in revenue in 2011 compared to 2010 revenue of $1.9 billion. Profit for 2011 was $1 billion. Out of the $3.71 billion revenue from 2011, $3.15 billion of it was from advertising – up 68 percent from 2010’s advertising revenue numbers of $1.87 billion. There was a 42 percent increase in advertisements delivered in 2011 and an 18 percent increase in the overall price of the advertisements.

Zynga represents about 12 percent of Facebook’s business. For every dollar that Zynga makes for gaming products, Facebook makes roughly 30 cents.

There are risks for investors, of course, including innovation from Twitter, Google and other social networking sites. With today’s notoriously fickle Internet user serving as the lifeblood of Facebook, even the slightest change in the wind could represent an exodus of users and subsequent loss in advertising economy.

Through it all, Zuckerberg says Facebook’s message is the same as it ever was: “People sharing more — even if just with their close friends or families — creates a more open culture and leads to a better understanding of the lives and perspectives of others. We believe that this creates a greater number of stronger relationships between people, and that it helps people get exposed to a greater number of diverse perspectives.”

Did you like this post ? TheTelecomBlog.com publishes daily news, editorial, thoughts, and controversial opinion – you can subscribe by: RSS (click here), or email (click here).

Written by: Jordan Richardson. www.digitcom.ca. Follow TheTelecomBlog.com by: RSS, Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube.

I’m torn. On the one hand I like my iPhone (I mean I really like it), while on the other hand I can’t ever imagine any of the staff here at Digitcom enduring the working conditions that those along Apple’s supply chain face on a daily basis. So what’s the answer? How do we fix this ethical problem?

Yesterday business mogul Donald Trump weighed in on the issue, challenging new Apple CEO Tim Cook to relocate Apple’s supply chain to America, calling for Apple to pioneer the move towards in-sourcing, that is, bringing American companies’ supply chains abroad back to U.S. soil. But in today’s global economic market is pulling production out of these countries really the answer?

Where Trump is clearly interested in companies like Apple bringing their supply chains to America as a way of boosting a flagging economy, I continue to frame the entire situation in human terms, in a way that helps the Chinese Foxconn workers and helps us here at home, and perhaps its within that framework that a possible solution can be found.

It was a little over a decade ago when the corporate trend of the day was outsourcing, the relocation of many aspects of one’s business, including manufacturing, supply lines, and customer service to other countries where employment standards were lower and employment expenditures could thus be reduced.

The result of such outsourcing was that many companies indeed were able to reduce employment costs and thus increase revenues, although for customers it often meant that a phone call to the customer service department of the company down the street meant a call rerouted to somewhere in rural Asia…but I digress.

For years now the North American consumer has been living in blissful ignorance of the human story behind outsourcing, happy to purchase cheaper gadgets and technology and happy to not have to think about any of the ethical issues associated with how those devices are made. But as enhanced communication brings our global community that much closer together it’s becoming impossible to ignore the impact that our consumer habits have on the rest of the world.

With all that said, though, the question remains, is outsourcing really the problem? There’s no question that companies traditionally outsource because labour is cheaper overseas, with countries like China and India taking hard stances against unionized labour, allowing wages to stay low. So to a degree there’s no denying that the drive to save a buck has created this situation.

In my mind, however, there could be even more damage done if companies like Apple pulled their manufacturing operations out of countries like China entirely, a move that would undoubtedly result in mass layoffs, ending in other human tragedies as well.

Truthfully (and I’m not sure how politically correct this will sound) I think the answer is that we need to start bringing some of our North American employment standards to these other countries, and its here, I think, that Apple could truly be a pioneer. As was stated yesterday, all Apple would realistically need to do would be to demand workers along its supply line be treated better and it would be done. As the NY Times report stated last week, “Suppliers would change everything tomorrow if Apple told them they didn’t have another choice.”

Is it all as simple as that? Probably not, but we have to start somewhere.

2011 was another good year for Shopify as the world’s fastest growing ecommerce platform in the world secured $15 Million in Series B funding. The company grew to 80 employees and speculations were rife that the company will need to make acquisitions to grow its business to the next level.

Yesterday, Shopify announced that it has acquired Ottawa mobile application developer Select Start Studios Inc. (aka S3) for an undisclosed amount. This “easy buy” is expected to help Shopify improve the accessibility of its products and enable customers to buy Shopify products using smartphones and tablets.

Though S3 is a tiny company with only 16 employees, it’s a well-known name in mobile app development circles in Ottawa. S3’s claim to fame includes iPhone apps for global accounting giant PricewaterhouseCoopers, phone listing provider Yellow Pages, telecommunications firm Avaya and others. Though the company’s headcount grew marginally last year, its revenues grew 600% during that time. Post acquisition, S3 will no longer exist as a separate legal entity, thereby boosting Shopify’s employee count to 100.

On the other hand, Shopify is widely regarded as one of the most exciting ecommerce startups wordwide. The company offers a do-it-yourself online shopping platform which powers more than 20,000 active online stores across 80 different international markets. The company’s partners include big names such as GE, Rovio Mobile and Evernote. Shopify has witnessed an encouraging increase in mobile transactions and with S3 in the bag, Ottawa’s fastest-growing company looks well poised for m-Commerce growth.

“After seeing a massive increase in mobile transactions at Shopify, we believe there is great demand and opportunity for mcommerce,” said Lutke. “The S3 acquisition brings in top talent that will rapidly deliver on our mobile strategy, and produce several new mobile product offerings this year. These guys are at the top of their game and know this stuff better than anyone. We’ve been saying for a while that Ottawa is a fantastic place for starting technology companies. This just confirms it.”

Tobi Lutke, Shopify’s co-founder and CEO believes that online shopping is the future. Therefore, it’s no coincidence that the company has purchased the mcommerce.com domain as well. Shopify plans to hire another 40 people by the end of year 2012.

Financial terms were not disclosed, but it is believed that the deal involved a mix of cash and stock.

Did you like this post? TheTelecomBlog.com publishes daily news, editorial, thoughts, and controversial opinion – you can subscribe by: RSS (click here), or email (click here).

Written by: Gaurav Kheterpal. www.digitcom.ca. Follow TheTelecomBlog.comby:RSS,Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube.

The Samsung Galaxy Note

With the steady proliferation of mobile technology the next thing customers are going to need is not another phone or tablet, but some sort of Batman-esque utility belt to hold all this stuff. The fact is many on the bleeding edge of technological innovation are discovering they have a problem, too many devices and not enough hands.

In today’s mobile market it seems there’s a device for everything, with tablets proficient in certain tasks and smartphones in others, with every tech company quickly looking for ways to unify these devices into one seamless user experience. But Samsung is taking this drive towards integration one step further (or perhaps one step backwards), ignoring advanced Cloud technology in favour of a simpler, more straightforward solution, a tablet/smartphone hybrid.

The Samsung Galaxy Note is set to hit shelves on February 19^th, touted as a new type of smartphone that blends the convenience of a smartphone with the functionality of a tablet. But such a hybrid device is really nothing new, and I would guess that even those looking to simplify their digital existence would still rather have one useable smartphone and one useable tablet, instead of one partially functional hybrid.

It was a little almost five months ago when the world got its first look at Samsung’s hybrid Galaxy Note device at the IFA tech conference in Berlin. The company touted its cutting edge hybrid device as a brand new class of smartphone set to fill that void between the conventional—and not to mention portable—smartphone and the versatile and functional tablet computing platform…if such a void really exists.

At the time the company stated, “The Galaxy Note is a new category of product, developed through Samsung’s deep consumer understanding and insight…It combines core on-the-go benefits of various mobile devices while maintaining smartphone portability to create a whole new user experience.”

I had to laugh when I first read Samsung’s effusive self-glorification (or perhaps self-delusion) when it spoke about the Galaxy Note as “a new category of product,” and of the company’s own “deep consumer understanding and insight,” given the fact that we’ve seen exactly this sort of hybrid device before with the Dell Streak and given the fact that consumers, in general, hated it.

According to Samsung, the Galaxy Note is targeted specifically at those looking to condense their proliferating device portfolio into a single product. Beyond that, I’m sure that the Galaxy Note will find its niche market, especially among certain professional and artistic crowds who will find value in the ability to scribble notes, drawings, or thoughts onto the phone with the included stylus, but I would guess that such a market still won’t be enough to keep the Note around for very long.

The issue with hybrid devices has historically been that they’re a Jack-of-all-trades but a King of none, functioning as a mediocre tablet and a mediocre smartphone. As I’ve said before, the problem with hybrid devices is generally that they combine the major weaknesses of the genres they are trying to marry, meaning that a device like the Note is too small to be a tablet, way too big to a smartphone; lacking the power or functionality of a tablet and, since it obscures half your face while you talk on it, I would say lacking the convenience of a mobile phone as well.

I’ll be interested to see if the Samsung Galaxy Note is able to overcome these weaknesses and actually succeed where others have failed when its released on February 19th–$300 on a two year contract with AT&T.

Did you like this post ? TheTelecomBlog.com publishes daily news, editorial, thoughts, and controversial opinion – you can subscribe by: RSS (click here), or email (click here).

Written by: Matt Klassen. www.digitcom.ca. Follow TheTelecomBlog.com by: RSS, Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube.

Facebook is expected to file for its initial public option (IPO) this week. Reports suggest that the social networking giant’s IPO will be worth between $5 billion and $10 billion, putting the company value somewhere in the neighbourhood of $75 billion to $100 billion.

If the numbers turn out to be accurate, this will be the largest IPO in Internet history and one of the top ten IPOs in the history of the United States.

When Facebook does file for its IPO, it means that the company’s proverbial bottom line will finally be out in the open. This should start a compelling discussion about the actual worth, in dollars as opposed to pokes, of the social networking company and, by extension, social media in general. Facebook’s IPO will set precedent with respect to other social networking IPOs.

Investors have been less than convinced of the worth of Facebook thus far, however, and there has been no clear message to suggest how Mark Zuckerberg’s baby makes money. The profitability of the business model, one that has generally resisted giving third parties free reign on advertising, is considered to be somewhat suspect in light of the fact that turning over the marketing tool to other advertisers could presumably double revenue.

That doesn’t mean Facebook hasn’t made money, mind you, as their current approach is considered to be quite successful. Research firm eMarketer estimated that Facebook made around $4.3 billion in revenue last year, with 90 percent of that coming from its current ad mechanism.

The IPO has to have advertiser’s salivating at the prospect of getting their mitts on what Facebook has: information. “The social networking king is an advertiser’s dream, accessing the intimate social behaviour of one in every 10 people in the world,” says Kathleen Smith, principal of IPO investment adviser Renaissance Capital.

Facebook now has to walk the fine line between letting advertisers in and keeping fickle social networking users happy. With its current targeted ad tool generating negative feedback, one has to wonder how a more intrusive approach will go over. The market will be watching, after all, and clicking that “like” button just took on a lot more meaning.

Did you like this post ? TheTelecomBlog.com publishes daily news, editorial, thoughts, and controversial opinion – you can subscribe by: RSS (click here), or email (click here).

Written by: Jordan Richardson. www.digitcom.ca. Follow TheTelecomBlog.com by: RSS, Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube.

Less than a week after a poignant NY Times exposé lambasted Apple for its substandard moderation and oversight of ongoing labour and worker safety issues in its Chinese supplied facilities– in which an unnamed Apple executive proclaimed that, “Right now, customers care more about a new iPhone than working conditions in China”–one group is calling out for an “ethical” iPhone, one made under fair labour practices.

Ethical watchdog group SumOfUs posted an online petition late last week, demanding that Apple resolve the inhumane working conditions and practices overseas and challenging the tech giant to create the “first ethical iPhone.”

In a recently leaked internal email, Apple CEO Tim Cook took issue with the reports that Apple was turning a blind eye to the veritable human tragedy being played out along the company’s supply chain, stating that “any suggestion that we don’t care is patently false and offensive to us.” As the petition states, if Cook is indeed as offended as he claims to be, the time is now to do something about it.

Apple has a long and somewhat controversial history with ethical issues, with the late Steve Jobs often pushing his whitewashed moral agenda on the tech consumer public in a strong-armed take-it-or-leave-it fashion. There was the longstanding debate over users ability to access and view adult material on their Apple devices, the recent controversy over homophobic mobile applications, and an apparent “glitch” in the company’s Siri voice assistant that prevented it from directing users to abortion clinics.

In most cases Apple took the route it considered to be the least controversial, hoping to avoid any sort of unified public outcry that might actually rouse the tech consuming public from its Apple-crazed hypnosis.

While it remains to be seen what Apple will do in response to this current situation, the difference here is that the working conditions of workers along Apple’s supply line is a matter of money, considerable money I would wager, and Apple has never been known to cough up one red cent if it can help it.

That said, SumOfUs is confident that such an overhaul to its supply line is realistic, as all Apple has to do is demand improvements from its supplies and they’ll be implemented. In fact, SumOfUs executive director Taren Stinebrickner-Kauffman has taken things one step further, challenging Apple CEO Tim Cook to stand by his words and prove whether he really is as offended by these allegations as he says he is.

Instead of blaming the media for covering this story, Stinebrickner-Kauffman argues, Cook needs to recognize that this is the supply chain he setup as the company’s former COO and “he needs to start taking responsibility, not blaming the messenger.”

The real question, though, is whether the general public actually wants an “ethical” iPhone, as while that weighty prefix may deliver improved working conditions for Chinese factory workers it’ll likely bring increased costs to the consumer here in North America as well. While I’m sure people signing the petition are willing to pay more for their gadgets, the lamentable fact is that there’s a long consumer history of money savings trumping ethical concerns and I fear it will do so once again here.

Did you like this post ? TheTelecomBlog.com publishes daily news, editorial, thoughts, and controversial opinion – you can subscribe by: RSS (click here), or email (click here).

Written by: Matt Klassen. www.digitcom.ca. Follow TheTelecomBlog.com by: RSS, Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube.

There’s no doubt that year 2011 belonged to Android – Google’s mobile operating system was a clear winner in the volume game as HTC took the top spot in the US smartphone market and Samsung set its eyes on Nokia. In November, Gartner confirmed that Android now accounts for almost 50% market share of worldwide smartphone shipments.

Valentine’s Day is around the corner and with so many Android devices being sold, don’t be surprised if your next date is an Android user as well. However, what do smartphones have to do with one’s dating habits? Apparently a lot – a recent survey from Match.com suggests Android leads the “dating and mating” game as Canadian singles that use Android phones are more likely to have sex on a first date. Period, err, I mean no period.

So, the next time you want to get laid on a date, try finding someone who uses an Android phone

The survey indicates that most Canadian singles believe e-mail and texting helped improve their dating habits. It reveals that Canadian Android users are most loose (aka The Seducers) and are likely to have sex on a first date with 62 per cent admitting they took the plunge. Android users also lead the roost on having one-night stands and in actively visiting dating websites. No wonder Steve Jobs said – If you want porn, get an Android.

The survey terms iPhone users as office romantics who prefer to date someone in their workplace. Moreover, iPhone users are generally pretty quick to move forward with relationships – they just need one day to reach out, while Android or BlackBerry users will wait until after 2-3 dates. Almost a quarter of iPhone users surveyed admitted having a workplace romance within the last five years.

The survey labels BlackBerry users as “Drunk Dialers” who prefer to drink alcohol on a first date with 72 per cent admitting to boozy night outs. Therefore, it’s no surprise that RIM executives sometimes get so drunk that they need to be handcuffed and restrained. Interestingly, BlackBerry users are prone to love at first sight with 67 per cent despite being the slowest to adopt online dating.

“Thanks to social networking and online dating, our love lives and our digital lives have never been more intertwined,” Match.com said in release about its survey.

And if you’re beginning to wonder can your smartphone get you laid – the survey also indicates being distracted by your mobile is the number one first date deal breaker

So, are you a seducer (Android), an office romantic (iPhone) or a drunk dialer (BlackBerry)? The survey doesn’t include Windows Phone users so I presume these users are busy playing with their new devices and don’t have the time to date. To be honest, I think that survey results were funny more than anything else. What’s your opinion?

Did you like this post? TheTelecomBlog.com publishes daily news, editorial, thoughts, and controversial opinion – you can subscribe by: RSS (click here), or email (click here).

Written by: Gaurav Kheterpal. www.digitcom.ca. Follow TheTelecomBlog.comby:RSS,Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube.

Research In Motion is getting set to turn the page and advance into its new future with a brand new “Be Bold” campaign.

The “Be Bold” campaign officially launched on New Year’s Eve but is now getting primed for an advertising blitz that will hit the usual targets, including through television spots.

The target audience for the campaign is American users, a critical group that RIM is hoping to reclaim after countless market stumbles in the United States. Thorsten Heins, the new president and CEO, has made it clear that the BlackBerry franchise needs to regain ground in the critical market.

Heins, in a company-wide memo, stated that the “Be Bold” campaign will play “an important role for all of us” as RIM goes through 2012.

Among the many changes the “Be Bold” campaign is being used to symbolize, one is the required culture change. The company has been facing stiff competition from the likes of Apple and  Android, so the atmosphere of RIM has been dismal – to say the last. Changing the profile of the company requires an infusion of positivity, something that’s hard to come by with plummeting market value and diminishing market share.

Still, Heins and the “Be Bold” campaign are game to try.

“Moving into this year, we’ll continue to anchor new advertising, digital and social media messaging on this compelling theme of Be Bold,” Heins wrote in the memo. “In fact, next week we will launch a TV campaign that features real-life BlackBerry users sharing their stories of action.”

Part of the “Be Bold” campaign will come in the form of four cartoon characters: GoGo Girl (The Achiever), Justin Steele (The Advocate), Trudy Foreal (The Authentic), and Max Stone (The Adventurer).

The characters have already been meshed with the company’s social media strategy to bring something new to the brand, but one has to imagine that the hope here really is for effective products. With BlackBerry 10 devices in the water and other changes to the OS in the works, RIM is getting yet another kick at changing its fortunes. Let’s hope they can make this one stick.

Did you like this post ? TheTelecomBlog.com publishes daily news, editorial, thoughts, and controversial opinion – you can subscribe by: RSS (click here), or email (click here).

Written by: Jordan Richardson. www.digitcom.ca. Follow TheTelecomBlog.com by: RSS, Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube.

While family voice and text bundles have long been mainstays of the American wireless world the concept of including data in that sort of family plan is relatively new, with many wireless carriers brainstorming ways of how they could offer data savings to families while still making money on one of the most lucrative aspects of the mobile market.

To that end, a report from tech site Engadget speculates that Verizon may be on the verge of offering such a data bundle, allowing families to share data across multiple subscribers on a single account. While there’s no official timeline for when Verizon will likely roll-out this new family data bundle, the company CFO acknowledged that Verizon is looking at ways at implementing a shared data plan, so long as its, “win-win for customers and for us.”

Always suspicious when I hear a large corporation talking about win-win situations regarding one it’s most lucrative profit streams though, I have to wonder just how much value families will get out of a unified data bundle and what plans Verizon may have to use such a bundle to continue to gouge its customers.

The tech site Engadget reported yesterday that it has access to new Verizon employee training material that indicates the arrival of a new version of the company’s data plans, with many speculating that this is indeed the advent of the family data bundle. Of course Engadget has no notion of when Verizon will introduce the new billing options, but its becoming abundantly clear that such a plan is in the works.

As I mentioned, Verizon CFO Fran Shammo said on the company’s earning call last week that the company is looking at various ways on how to create and implement a smartphone family data plan. “We need to make sure it’s a win-win for customers and for us,” he said. “So we will continue to work on that. But it’s important to note that we are a premium priced service in the market. And we will continue with that strategy, and we’ll continue to win.”

Not one known for helping out its customers with an over-abundance of savings, I do have to wonder how Verizon will turn a family data bundle into a win for itself—as I’m sure it truly cares little for helping its customers win anything—and the one aspect that immediately comes to my mind is data overages.

While I’m sure that any sort of family data bundle will look attractive and affordable on the surface, I’d be willing to bet that Verizon will structure them in such a way where the data usage allotment will only be a small increase over that offered to single subscribers, with the hopes of course that multiple users will be almost be forced to go over their data limit and subsequently have to pay hefty overage fees.

My ever-present skepticism aside, there are a few ways such a family bundle will actually help customers. First, for those that are stingy with their data use, there will of course be some savings available (or else it wouldn’t really be a bundle at all) for families with multiple smartphones on the go. Second, such a plan would conceivably allow single users with multiple devices to lump them together on the same data plan as well, saving them money and eliminating the need to sign up for and manage multiple accounts.

But once again, given the fact that wireless carriers are always thinking up ways to make more money off data (and thus not save you anything) my guess would be that any savings, if there really are any at all, won’t be significant, with the true value of the new plan simply being the convenience of a single (and not to mention hefty) bill.

Did you like this post ? TheTelecomBlog.com publishes daily news, editorial, thoughts, and controversial opinion – you can subscribe by: RSS (click here), or email (click here).

Written by: Matt Klassen. www.digitcom.ca. Follow TheTelecomBlog.com by: RSS, Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube.

Year 2011 was a stepping stone for LTE in Canada. Rogers and Bell launched their respective LTE networks and both carriers set the ball rolling on major expansions plans for 2012. Telus has already predicted a “Big 2012” as it plans to spend as much as $1.85 billion in 2012 on wireless capacity and deploying its LTE wireless network in many urban markets.

While the Big Three will be vying for LTE supremacy this year, there’s no doubt that Rogers is well ahead of any other Canadian wireless carrier in the LTE game. Last July, the carrier launched Canada’s first Long Term Evolution (LTE) wireless network in Ottawa. A month later, the Rogers LTE bandwagon headed to Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal and the carrier rounded off an impressive year by further expanding its LTE footprint in Vancouver and Toronto.

To that effect, Rogers yesterday announced that it expanded its LTE coverage area in Montreal to now reach Laval, Terrebonne, Brossard, Longueuil and Vaudreuil. Keeping up with its aggressive LTE expansion strategy, Rogers announced that it plans to expand 4G coverage to more than 25 additional cities and cover 20 million customers by the end of the year.

“We were proud to be first to bring the LTE network to Canadians,” said John Boynton, Rogers Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer. “Today, we reach over 11 million and we are continuing to expand. By the end of 2012 we will double this with 20 million Canadians able to use LTE devices to download apps, stream HD videos and music or play on-line games, with no delays or buffering.”

Rogers already offers a wide array of LTE-enabled devices including the LTE Rocket™ mobile hotspot (Sierra Wireless AirCard, two LTE smartphones, the Rogers exclusive Samsung Galaxy S II LTE smartphone™ and the HTC Raider™, the Rogers exclusive HTC Jetstream™ LTE tablet and the Rogers LTE Rocket stick (Sierra Wireless AirCard ® 313U). The carrier yesterday announced the addition of Samsung Galaxy Note to its impressive LTE lineup.

Rogers CEO Nadir Mohamed believes that LTE is the future and it would “fuel Canada’s digital economy” in this century. Mohamed maintains that bagging the lion’s share of LTE early adopters has always been Rogers’ goal and its team has toiled hard to advance the roll out by months.

As my fellow blogger Jeff Weiner predicted 2012 may forever be remembered as “The year of LTE in Canada”. Since its release in 2011 LTE has quickly become the market standard for next gen wireless networks, with many other competing technologies like WiMax already admitting defeat. In fact, while LTE still remains an emerging technology look for it to infiltrate most corners of our technological existence this next year, replacing carrier’s 3G service in many markets.

Did you like this post? TheTelecomBlog.com publishes daily news, editorial, thoughts, and controversial opinion – you can subscribe by: RSS (click here), or email (click here).

Written by: Gaurav Kheterpal. www.digitcom.ca. Follow TheTelecomBlog.comby:RSS,Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube.

Research In Motion’s new chief executive officer Thorsten Heins went in front of some 17,000 employees on Friday in a broadcast discussion that attempted to set the tone for the road ahead. Heins certainly has his work cut out for him and will have an uphill climb with regard to getting things back on track at RIM (if that can even be done).

Heins wasted little time, discussing the challenges ahead as well as his priorities going forward.

There’s no question that RIM is at perhaps the most problematic period in its history. Its failure would be catastrophic for Canada’s already-stumbling technology sector, one marred by sell-offs and sell-outs over the past years. With RIM experiencing massive market value loss and device issues, there’s no time like the present to rally the troops.

“When we started this strategy of going global, we knew we had to throw basically most of our resources into the global play, which we did, and look at the success,” Heins said, describing the company’s fortunes outside of the United States markets. “But we had to do this a little bit at the expense of being very, very strong in the number one competitive market of the world, which is the U.S. market. This was a conscious decision that we took. Now we have to get through this.”

Heins also took some time for questions, answering some that were emailed in.

He tackled rumours that the company was in talks to sell, squashing the notions that Samsung was in talks to buy RIM.

“Simply, simply no,” Heins said. “It’s a fantastic growth and profit story. There’s no reason to go and sell the company. You guys are fantastic. We have a fantastic brain base and intellectual base. We have fantastic board members supporting us, and also into the future. Why should we do this? We are going to do this ourselves.”

To what will probably be the dismay of some fidgety investors, Heins thanked Jim Balsillie and Mike Lazaridis and implied that the two would continue to be a part of the process of innovation at RIM.

“One of the issues we really need to tackle in the future is not the innovation – that will be always covered as long as Mike and Jim are on the board and help us with strategic advice and counsel, and Mike will run the new innovation committee on the board,” Heins said.

The meeting lasted roughly and hour and seemed to go over well with most of the employees. The markets could react in a different way, of course, with Heins ever having said too much or, once again, having said far too little.

Did you like this post ? TheTelecomBlog.com publishes daily news, editorial, thoughts, and controversial opinion – you can subscribe by: RSS (click here), or email (click here).

Written by: Jordan Richardson. www.digitcom.ca. Follow TheTelecomBlog.com by: RSS, Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube.

The Cold War-esque proxy patent battle between Google and Apple is heating up (or would that be cooling off?) with news that Google acquisition target Motorola Mobility is once again suing Apple for alleged infringement of six of its patents—which may in fact be Motorola’s entire patent portfolio.

The lawsuit, filed in Florida court, relates to the iPhone antennae, software, data filtering, and messaging and is simply the latest in a long line of legal salvos fired between Apple and the broader Android camp, with both sides winning and losing decisive battles mostly in European markets.

In fact, most see Apple’s legal wrangling with notables Samsung, HTC, and Motorola as a by-proxy attack against Google’s Android operating system, with the late Steve Jobs going as far as to say that he and his company were prepared to wage “thermonuclear war” against Google’s OS for market superiority. But does this OS Cold War have any real impact on the mobile market, or is it  all simply intimidation tactics at work?

Despite the fact that Motorola has won a temporary injunction against Apple in Germany and Samsung continues to mount up both wins and losses in its own legal dance with the Cupertino technology giant, I have yet to see this endless legal to-and-fro have any real impact on the mobile market. In fact, I have yet to hear of anyone anywhere not getting access to their OS of choice because of some legal decision.

But while I consider this whole legal soap opera to be pointless and rather boring, it certainly seems that Apple, Google, and the myriad of Android partners are all taking it quite seriously. In fact, many believe that Google’s pending acquisition of Motorola Mobility is driven primarily by a desire to bolster the defences of the Android ecosystem in general, giving Google its own proxy to wage war on Apple.

Now don’t get me wrong, I understand why the legal games are being played, as I clearly see the mobile market—as with any market I suppose—as one big chess board, with each company moving the pieces available in ways that block each one’s respective competitors, with legal action being one of those pieces, I’m just confused why companies continue to move this particular piece, since I haven’t’ seen any Android or Apple phone ever get blocked from a given market as a result of legislation.

But perhaps there is some method to Apple’s madness after all, as I have to wonder just how much legal trouble these smaller Android partners are willing to put up with before Google’s OS simply isn’t cost effective anymore—admittedly a strange thing to say about a free mobile operating system.

If Apple should decisively win any of its ongoing legal battles any subsequent decision regarding patent infringement would likely cost Android partners like Samsung, HTC, and Motorola dearly, either in heavy licensing fees paid to Apple or the loss of revenue associated with being unable to sell certain devices in certain markets. It is conceivable that such continued legal pestering is all some of these companies might need to start exploring their own OS options and, as I’ve said before, leave Android in the dust.

Did you like this post ? TheTelecomBlog.com publishes daily news, editorial, thoughts, and controversial opinion – you can subscribe by: RSS (click here), or email (click here).

Written by: Matt Klassen. www.digitcom.ca. Follow TheTelecomBlog.com by: RSS, Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube.

In today’s hustle-and-bustle world, videoconferencing has become an invaluable tool in many board rooms and offices around the world. It’s a convenient way to connect with people who may otherwise not be able to make it in to the location in person, but new questions are being raised about the security of videoconferencing setups.

According to HD Moore, the chief security expert at Rapid7, tens of thousands of videoconferencing setups the world over are vulnerable to spying and hacker attacks.

Moore, using scanning tools, surveyed a small percentage of the Internet to discover videoconferencing hardware that used what is known as the H.323 protocol – the most commonly used protocol for videoconferencing equipment. Two percent of all videoconferencing setups using the protocol were at risk of hacker infiltration.

The trouble, says Moore, is that the videoconferences were set up to automatically answer incoming calls. On top of that, most didn’t use a firewall.

From his sample size, Moore estimated that more than 150,000 videoconferencing setups were vulnerable to eavesdropping thanks to the microphone and the remote-controlled camera. In positioning the videoconferences without firewalls and with auto-answer features, the setups are effectively “naked” on the Internet and virtually anyone with moderate tech know-how can peer in.

Moore was able to access conferences held in a variety of places, including corporate board rooms, law offices, research facilities, and venture capital firms.

In one startling instance, Moore says he was able to dial in to a conference and operate the camera. Using the zoom function, he saw someone enter a password in on a laptop. Moore watched the room for some 20 minutes without anyone noticing the motion of the camera.

David Maldow, from Telepresence Options, countered Moore’s findings by stating that “it should be noted that projecting an atmosphere of security risk in videoconferencing is clearly in their interest.” Maldow went on to explain that some of Moore’s claims were a little exaggerated. “I simply don’t see a massive threat in the fact that it is possible to get lucky and randomly dial into an anonymous empty meeting room,” wrote Maldow.

A response to Maldow’s article is already up and running from Moore. “At the end of the day, we stick by our position that videoconferencing systems are often deployed in an insecure manner and that the risk of unauthorized access is not something that many IT administrators or company executives are aware of today,” says Moore.

Did you like this post ? TheTelecomBlog.com publishes daily news, editorial, thoughts, and controversial opinion – you can subscribe by: RSS (click here), or email (click here).

Written by: Jordan Richardson. www.digitcom.ca. Follow TheTelecomBlog.com by: RSS, Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube.