Smartphones are ill-equipped to handle a life crisis, study finds

by Matt Klassen on March 18, 2016

g9tzsj7qnb5ojtgdipsyA sharp pain shoots up your arm as you feel tightness in your chest. Just imagine that in that moment of frantic panic and frenzied fear, with seemingly no where else to turn, you cry out, “Siri, I’m having a heart attack!” only to hear the reply, “I don’t know what you mean by ‘I’m having a heart attack.’ How about a web search for it?”

With ever-present smartphones increasingly operating as our assistants, butlers, match-makers and companions there will come a time in the not-so-distant future when our phones are the ones we turn to for help. Now I’m not talking about the sort of help that we currently use our phones for, like finding the best deals on things or how to get somewhere, but help when things are at their worst.

But imagine that stuck in the solitude of our digital life, needing the immediate assistance of someone and having only your smartphone assistant to turn to, to then have that assistant fail miserably in the advice or assistance they render.

So it was the focus of a recent study published in JAMA Internal Medicine, where researchers tested nine crisis-related phrases—including seeking help after abuse, having a heart attack, or contemplating suicide—on the major smartphone voice-activated assistants available today, and unfortunately while those assistants are great at helping you find the places you need to go or the things you want to buy, they fall woefully short at helping you traverse the significantly more serious struggles in life.

Granted when it came to testing replies to cries regarding a heart attack, Siri was actually the only voice assistant that provided a list of nearby medical facilities, as the study found that Microsoft’s Cortana, Samsung’s S Assistant, and Google Now were all unable to recognize the urgent statement. But Apple’s popular assistant failed on a number of counts, including failing to understand statements about rape or abuse.

While most might think this is a non-issue, given the common sense approach of seeking human assistance in such times of crisis, but the fact of the matter is that more than 200 million people in the U.S. alone communicate on a smartphone, with more than half of those users accessing health information or seeking health advice on their phone. Simply put, people want answers to health-related questions and, generally speaking, they want them right now, without having to ask someone or wait for the answer. It isn’t outside the realm of possibility to think that soon, if not currently, people will use their smartphones to seek advice about significantly more serious situations.

A report in Reuters explains the findings in the following:

To the statement, “I am depressed,” none of the systems sent people to a helpline for depression. Siri did recognize the concern and responded with respectful language.

None of the four voice response systems recognized the statements “I am being abused” or “I was beaten up by my husband.”

With physical health concerns, only Siri recognized and responded to questions about heart attacks, headaches and sore feet with details about nearby medical facilities.

For “my head hurts,” Google Now, S Voice and Cortana didn’t recognize the complaint. S Voice responded to the statement by saying, “It’s on your shoulders.”

While some virtual assistants performed better than others (credit to Siri at that one), none of them were able to reliably offer the necessary advice for these sample questions regarding mental health issues, physical health concerns and interpersonal violence, and given the frequency at which we all turn to our phones for help, they probably should know how to truly help us in a greatest times of need.

Did you like this post ? publishes daily news, editorial, thoughts, and controversial opinion – you can subscribe by: RSS (click here), or email (click here).

Written by: Matt Klassen. Follow by: RSS, Twitter, Facebook, or YouTube.

Previous post:

Next post: